not just one RFC this month, but RFC 4042 also. this one introduces two new encoding formats of Unicode, called UTF-9 and UTF-18, for machines with a 9-bit byte.
kind of amusing but also a bit of a ripoff of ATF-8.
'tis a standard for something entirely pointless. also, one of the code examples is in a bizarre programming language (PDP-10 assembly, not used for several decades really). so yes. but would have been funnier had ATF-8 not already parodied UTF-8 in a much more amusing (and harder to explain) way.
the problem with that is that UTF-9 would actually be quite sensible for people working on PDP-10s (yes, they're still around), so it loses a lot of the humour value...
yes. i send an aggrieved email asking why ATF-8 was not cited, and got a brusque reply not really confirming if they knew they were stealing me and Marco's joke or not. if it was done with better humour, i would be less annoyed.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2005-04-05 07:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-05 08:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-05 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-05 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-05 03:03 pm (UTC)